High Level Puzzles for IBPS PO/Clerk/Insurance 2017 : Set – 49

B. W, Vodafone

Let nine persons be sitting around a circular table from 1 to 9 in clockwise direction. R sits third to the right of W. Only two people sit between X and T and one of them sits with W. W sits at 1 and R sits at 4. There can be two cases:

Case 1: X, T sit at (9,6) in any order. The person from Delhi is third to the left of the one from Hyderabad and none of them is R or sits with R. So, the persons from Delhi, Hyderabad can sit at (6,9) (first case) or (7,1) (second case) or (8,2) (third case) respectively. S who is not from Hyderabad, sits to the immediate right of P who is not from Delhi or Hyderabad. S, P can sit at (8,7) (in first case and third case) or (3,2) (in first and second case) respectively according to the positions of the persons from Delhi, Hyderabad in respective order. The only person representing Birla sits to the immediate left of U who is from Chandigarh. R doesn’t represent Birla. U doesn’t sit with W and V. X and V represent the same company but not Reliance. T represents his company with only one person. It means that X and T cannot represent Birla. So, in the second case, U sits at 8 and the one at 7 represents Birla. As V doesn’t sit with U so V sits at 5
and Q sits at 7. The person third to the right of Q is from Mumbai. But W is from Hyderabad. So, second case is not possible. In the first case, when S, P sit at (3,2) respectively, U sits at 8 and the person at 7 must represent Birla. The person from Ahmedabad sits closer to the left of W than right of W. The persons from Ahmedabad and Pune sit together and they represent different companies. But there is no space for these persons so S, P cannot sit at (3,2) in the first case. S, P sit at (8,7) respectively in the first case. U can only sit at 3 and the person representing Birla is at 2. Thus, the persons from Ahmedabad and Pune can only sit at (8,7) respectively. As U doesn’t sit with V so V sits at 5 and Q sits at 2. The person third to the right of Q is from Mumbai so V is from Mumbai. One of the persons representing Tata is from Bangalore and he sits to the immediate left of the one from Chennai. So, W is from Bangalore and Q is from Chennai. It is given that only if Q is from Chennai then U represents Reliance. It means that R must represent Reliance. Also, R is from Lucknow. As X and V represent the same company but not Reliance so X sits at 9 and T sits at 6. V doesn’t represent Vodafone so X and V represent Airtel. They cannot represent Tata as W represents Tata. Either S or T represents Airtel. But only the persons representing Reliance sit together. So, the persons from Delhi, Hyderabad have to be at (8,2) respectively. Thus, S, P sit at (8,7) respectively. The persons from Ahmedabad, Pune can sit at (7,6) in any order. As U doesn’t sit with V so Q sits at 2 and V sits at 5. The person third to the right of Q is from Mumbai. V is from Mumbai. The person from Ahmedabad doesn’t sit to the immediate right of the one from Mumbai. So, the persons from Ahmedabad, Pune must sit at (7,6) respectively. X and V represent the same company but not Reliance so X sits at  9 and T sits at 6. One of the persons representing Tata is from Bangalore and he sits to the immediate left of the one from Chennai. So, X is from Bangalore and W is from Chennai. V also represents Tata. Only if Q is from Chennai then U represents Reliance. So, U cannot represent Reliance. Thus, S and P have to represent Reliance. Also, R is from Lucknow. Either S or T represents Airtel so T represents Airtel. U doesn’t represent Tata. The person to the immediate right of Q doesn’t represent Vodafone. It means that U has to represent Airtel. Thus, R has to represent Vodafone. The person from Chennai doesn’t represent Airtel. It implies that W has to represent Vodafone.

Case 2: X, T sit at (2,5) in any order. The person from Delhi is third to the left of the one from Hyderabad and none of them is R or sits with R. So, the persons from Delhi, Hyderabad can sit at (6,9) (first case) or (7,1) (second case) or (8,2) (third case) respectively. S who is not from Hyderabad, sits to the immediate right of P who is not from Delhi or Hyderabad. S, P can sit at (8,7) (in first case and third case) or (9,8) (in second case) or (7,6) (in second and third case) respectively according to the positions of the persons from Delhi, Hyderabad in respective order. The only person representing Birla sits to the immediate left of U who is from Chandigarh. R doesn’t represent Birla. U doesn’t sit with W and V. X and V represent the same company but not Reliance. T represents his company with only one person. It means that X and T cannot represent Birla. So, U who is from Chandigarh cannot sit anywhere in any of the cases except in the second case when S, P sit at (7,6) respectively. Thus, U sits at 8 and S is from Birla. As U doesn’t sit with V so Q sits at 9 and V sits at 3. X and V represent the same company but not Reliance. So, V and X cannot sit together. X, T sit at (5,2) respectively. The person from Ahmedabad sits closer to the left of W than right of W. The persons from Ahmedabad and Pune sit together and they represent different companies. So, the persons from Ahmedabad and Pune sit at (6,5) respectively. The person third to the right of Q is from Mumbai. V is from Mumbai. One of the persons representing Tata is from Bangalore and he sits to the immediate left of the one from Chennai. They cannot sit anywhere so this case gets rejected

The final arrangement is shown below:

C. The person from Pune

Let nine persons be sitting around a circular table from 1 to 9 in clockwise direction. R sits third to the right of W. Only two people sit between X and T and one of them sits with W. W sits at 1 and R sits at 4. There can be two cases:

Case 1: X, T sit at (9,6) in any order. The person from Delhi is third to the left of the one from Hyderabad and none of them is R or sits with R. So, the persons from Delhi, Hyderabad can sit at (6,9) (first case) or (7,1) (second case) or (8,2) (third case) respectively. S who is not from Hyderabad, sits to the immediate right of P who is not from Delhi or Hyderabad. S, P can sit at (8,7) (in first case and third case) or (3,2) (in first and second case) respectively according to the positions of the persons from Delhi, Hyderabad in respective order. The only person representing Birla sits to the immediate left of U who is from Chandigarh. R doesn’t represent Birla. U doesn’t sit with W and V. X and V represent the same company but not Reliance. T represents his company with only one person. It means that X and T cannot represent Birla. So, in the second case, U sits at 8 and the one at 7 represents Birla. As V doesn’t sit with U so V sits at 5
and Q sits at 7. The person third to the right of Q is from Mumbai. But W is from Hyderabad. So, second case is not possible. In the first case, when S, P sit at (3,2) respectively, U sits at 8 and the person at 7 must represent Birla. The person from Ahmedabad sits closer to the left of W than right of W. The persons from Ahmedabad and Pune sit together and they represent different companies. But there is no space for these persons so S, P cannot sit at (3,2) in the first case. S, P sit at (8,7) respectively in the first case. U can only sit at 3 and the person representing Birla is at 2. Thus, the persons from Ahmedabad and Pune can only sit at (8,7) respectively. As U doesn’t sit with V so V sits at 5 and Q sits at 2. The person third to the right of Q is from Mumbai so V is from Mumbai. One of the persons representing Tata is from Bangalore and he sits to the immediate left of the one from Chennai. So, W is from Bangalore and Q is from Chennai. It is given that only if Q is from Chennai then U represents Reliance. It means that R must represent Reliance. Also, R is from Lucknow. As X and V represent the same company but not Reliance so X sits at 9 and T sits at 6. V doesn’t represent Vodafone so X and V represent Airtel. They cannot represent Tata as W represents Tata. Either S or T represents Airtel. But only the persons representing Reliance sit together. So, the persons from Delhi, Hyderabad have to be at (8,2) respectively. Thus, S, P sit at (8,7) respectively. The persons from Ahmedabad, Pune can sit at (7,6) in any order. As U doesn’t sit with V so Q sits at 2 and V sits at 5. The person third to the right of Q is from Mumbai. V is from Mumbai. The person from Ahmedabad doesn’t sit to the immediate right of the one from Mumbai. So, the persons from Ahmedabad, Pune must sit at (7,6) respectively. X and V represent the same company but not Reliance so X sits at  9 and T sits at 6. One of the persons representing Tata is from Bangalore and he sits to the immediate left of the one from Chennai. So, X is from Bangalore and W is from Chennai. V also represents Tata. Only if Q is from Chennai then U represents Reliance. So, U cannot represent Reliance. Thus, S and P have to represent Reliance. Also, R is from Lucknow. Either S or T represents Airtel so T represents Airtel. U doesn’t represent Tata. The person to the immediate right of Q doesn’t represent Vodafone. It means that U has to represent Airtel. Thus, R has to represent Vodafone. The person from Chennai doesn’t represent Airtel. It implies that W has to represent Vodafone.

Case 2: X, T sit at (2,5) in any order. The person from Delhi is third to the left of the one from Hyderabad and none of them is R or sits with R. So, the persons from Delhi, Hyderabad can sit at (6,9) (first case) or (7,1) (second case) or (8,2) (third case) respectively. S who is not from Hyderabad, sits to the immediate right of P who is not from Delhi or Hyderabad. S, P can sit at (8,7) (in first case and third case) or (9,8) (in second case) or (7,6) (in second and third case) respectively according to the positions of the persons from Delhi, Hyderabad in respective order. The only person representing Birla sits to the immediate left of U who is from Chandigarh. R doesn’t represent Birla. U doesn’t sit with W and V. X and V represent the same company but not Reliance. T represents his company with only one person. It means that X and T cannot represent Birla. So, U who is from Chandigarh cannot sit anywhere in any of the cases except in the second case when S, P sit at (7,6) respectively. Thus, U sits at 8 and S is from Birla. As U doesn’t sit with V so Q sits at 9 and V sits at 3. X and V represent the same company but not Reliance. So, V and X cannot sit together. X, T sit at (5,2) respectively. The person from Ahmedabad sits closer to the left of W than right of W. The persons from Ahmedabad and Pune sit together and they represent different companies. So, the persons from Ahmedabad and Pune sit at (6,5) respectively. The person third to the right of Q is from Mumbai. V is from Mumbai. One of the persons representing Tata is from Bangalore and he sits to the immediate left of the one from Chennai. They cannot sit anywhere so this case gets rejected

The final arrangement is shown below:

B. Reliance

Let nine persons be sitting around a circular table from 1 to 9 in clockwise direction. R sits third to the right of W. Only two people sit between X and T and one of them sits with W. W sits at 1 and R sits at 4. There can be two cases:

Case 1: X, T sit at (9,6) in any order. The person from Delhi is third to the left of the one from Hyderabad and none of them is R or sits with R. So, the persons from Delhi, Hyderabad can sit at (6,9) (first case) or (7,1) (second case) or (8,2) (third case) respectively. S who is not from Hyderabad, sits to the immediate right of P who is not from Delhi or Hyderabad. S, P can sit at (8,7) (in first case and third case) or (3,2) (in first and second case) respectively according to the positions of the persons from Delhi, Hyderabad in respective order. The only person representing Birla sits to the immediate left of U who is from Chandigarh. R doesn’t represent Birla. U doesn’t sit with W and V. X and V represent the same company but not Reliance. T represents his company with only one person. It means that X and T cannot represent Birla. So, in the second case, U sits at 8 and the one at 7 represents Birla. As V doesn’t sit with U so V sits at 5
and Q sits at 7. The person third to the right of Q is from Mumbai. But W is from Hyderabad. So, second case is not possible. In the first case, when S, P sit at (3,2) respectively, U sits at 8 and the person at 7 must represent Birla. The person from Ahmedabad sits closer to the left of W than right of W. The persons from Ahmedabad and Pune sit together and they represent different companies. But there is no space for these persons so S, P cannot sit at (3,2) in the first case. S, P sit at (8,7) respectively in the first case. U can only sit at 3 and the person representing Birla is at 2. Thus, the persons from Ahmedabad and Pune can only sit at (8,7) respectively. As U doesn’t sit with V so V sits at 5 and Q sits at 2. The person third to the right of Q is from Mumbai so V is from Mumbai. One of the persons representing Tata is from Bangalore and he sits to the immediate left of the one from Chennai. So, W is from Bangalore and Q is from Chennai. It is given that only if Q is from Chennai then U represents Reliance. It means that R must represent Reliance. Also, R is from Lucknow. As X and V represent the same company but not Reliance so X sits at 9 and T sits at 6. V doesn’t represent Vodafone so X and V represent Airtel. They cannot represent Tata as W represents Tata. Either S or T represents Airtel. But only the persons representing Reliance sit together. So, the persons from Delhi, Hyderabad have to be at (8,2) respectively. Thus, S, P sit at (8,7) respectively. The persons from Ahmedabad, Pune can sit at (7,6) in any order. As U doesn’t sit with V so Q sits at 2 and V sits at 5. The person third to the right of Q is from Mumbai. V is from Mumbai. The person from Ahmedabad doesn’t sit to the immediate right of the one from Mumbai. So, the persons from Ahmedabad, Pune must sit at (7,6) respectively. X and V represent the same company but not Reliance so X sits at  9 and T sits at 6. One of the persons representing Tata is from Bangalore and he sits to the immediate left of the one from Chennai. So, X is from Bangalore and W is from Chennai. V also represents Tata. Only if Q is from Chennai then U represents Reliance. So, U cannot represent Reliance. Thus, S and P have to represent Reliance. Also, R is from Lucknow. Either S or T represents Airtel so T represents Airtel. U doesn’t represent Tata. The person to the immediate right of Q doesn’t represent Vodafone. It means that U has to represent Airtel. Thus, R has to represent Vodafone. The person from Chennai doesn’t represent Airtel. It implies that W has to represent Vodafone.

Case 2: X, T sit at (2,5) in any order. The person from Delhi is third to the left of the one from Hyderabad and none of them is R or sits with R. So, the persons from Delhi, Hyderabad can sit at (6,9) (first case) or (7,1) (second case) or (8,2) (third case) respectively. S who is not from Hyderabad, sits to the immediate right of P who is not from Delhi or Hyderabad. S, P can sit at (8,7) (in first case and third case) or (9,8) (in second case) or (7,6) (in second and third case) respectively according to the positions of the persons from Delhi, Hyderabad in respective order. The only person representing Birla sits to the immediate left of U who is from Chandigarh. R doesn’t represent Birla. U doesn’t sit with W and V. X and V represent the same company but not Reliance. T represents his company with only one person. It means that X and T cannot represent Birla. So, U who is from Chandigarh cannot sit anywhere in any of the cases except in the second case when S, P sit at (7,6) respectively. Thus, U sits at 8 and S is from Birla. As U doesn’t sit with V so Q sits at 9 and V sits at 3. X and V represent the same company but not Reliance. So, V and X cannot sit together. X, T sit at (5,2) respectively. The person from Ahmedabad sits closer to the left of W than right of W. The persons from Ahmedabad and Pune sit together and they represent different companies. So, the persons from Ahmedabad and Pune sit at (6,5) respectively. The person third to the right of Q is from Mumbai. V is from Mumbai. One of the persons representing Tata is from Bangalore and he sits to the immediate left of the one from Chennai. They cannot sit anywhere so this case gets rejected

The final arrangement is shown below:

B. One

Let nine persons be sitting around a circular table from 1 to 9 in clockwise direction. R sits third to the right of W. Only two people sit between X and T and one of them sits with W. W sits at 1 and R sits at 4. There can be two cases:

Case 1: X, T sit at (9,6) in any order. The person from Delhi is third to the left of the one from Hyderabad and none of them is R or sits with R. So, the persons from Delhi, Hyderabad can sit at (6,9) (first case) or (7,1) (second case) or (8,2) (third case) respectively. S who is not from Hyderabad, sits to the immediate right of P who is not from Delhi or Hyderabad. S, P can sit at (8,7) (in first case and third case) or (3,2) (in first and second case) respectively according to the positions of the persons from Delhi, Hyderabad in respective order. The only person representing Birla sits to the immediate left of U who is from Chandigarh. R doesn’t represent Birla. U doesn’t sit with W and V. X and V represent the same company but not Reliance. T represents his company with only one person. It means that X and T cannot represent Birla. So, in the second case, U sits at 8 and the one at 7 represents Birla. As V doesn’t sit with U so V sits at 5
and Q sits at 7. The person third to the right of Q is from Mumbai. But W is from Hyderabad. So, second case is not possible. In the first case, when S, P sit at (3,2) respectively, U sits at 8 and the person at 7 must represent Birla. The person from Ahmedabad sits closer to the left of W than right of W. The persons from Ahmedabad and Pune sit together and they represent different companies. But there is no space for these persons so S, P cannot sit at (3,2) in the first case. S, P sit at (8,7) respectively in the first case. U can only sit at 3 and the person representing Birla is at 2. Thus, the persons from Ahmedabad and Pune can only sit at (8,7) respectively. As U doesn’t sit with V so V sits at 5 and Q sits at 2. The person third to the right of Q is from Mumbai so V is from Mumbai. One of the persons representing Tata is from Bangalore and he sits to the immediate left of the one from Chennai. So, W is from Bangalore and Q is from Chennai. It is given that only if Q is from Chennai then U represents Reliance. It means that R must represent Reliance. Also, R is from Lucknow. As X and V represent the same company but not Reliance so X sits at 9 and T sits at 6. V doesn’t represent Vodafone so X and V represent Airtel. They cannot represent Tata as W represents Tata. Either S or T represents Airtel. But only the persons representing Reliance sit together. So, the persons from Delhi, Hyderabad have to be at (8,2) respectively. Thus, S, P sit at (8,7) respectively. The persons from Ahmedabad, Pune can sit at (7,6) in any order. As U doesn’t sit with V so Q sits at 2 and V sits at 5. The person third to the right of Q is from Mumbai. V is from Mumbai. The person from Ahmedabad doesn’t sit to the immediate right of the one from Mumbai. So, the persons from Ahmedabad, Pune must sit at (7,6) respectively. X and V represent the same company but not Reliance so X sits at  9 and T sits at 6. One of the persons representing Tata is from Bangalore and he sits to the immediate left of the one from Chennai. So, X is from Bangalore and W is from Chennai. V also represents Tata. Only if Q is from Chennai then U represents Reliance. So, U cannot represent Reliance. Thus, S and P have to represent Reliance. Also, R is from Lucknow. Either S or T represents Airtel so T represents Airtel. U doesn’t represent Tata. The person to the immediate right of Q doesn’t represent Vodafone. It means that U has to represent Airtel. Thus, R has to represent Vodafone. The person from Chennai doesn’t represent Airtel. It implies that W has to represent Vodafone.

Case 2: X, T sit at (2,5) in any order. The person from Delhi is third to the left of the one from Hyderabad and none of them is R or sits with R. So, the persons from Delhi, Hyderabad can sit at (6,9) (first case) or (7,1) (second case) or (8,2) (third case) respectively. S who is not from Hyderabad, sits to the immediate right of P who is not from Delhi or Hyderabad. S, P can sit at (8,7) (in first case and third case) or (9,8) (in second case) or (7,6) (in second and third case) respectively according to the positions of the persons from Delhi, Hyderabad in respective order. The only person representing Birla sits to the immediate left of U who is from Chandigarh. R doesn’t represent Birla. U doesn’t sit with W and V. X and V represent the same company but not Reliance. T represents his company with only one person. It means that X and T cannot represent Birla. So, U who is from Chandigarh cannot sit anywhere in any of the cases except in the second case when S, P sit at (7,6) respectively. Thus, U sits at 8 and S is from Birla. As U doesn’t sit with V so Q sits at 9 and V sits at 3. X and V represent the same company but not Reliance. So, V and X cannot sit together. X, T sit at (5,2) respectively. The person from Ahmedabad sits closer to the left of W than right of W. The persons from Ahmedabad and Pune sit together and they represent different companies. So, the persons from Ahmedabad and Pune sit at (6,5) respectively. The person third to the right of Q is from Mumbai. V is from Mumbai. One of the persons representing Tata is from Bangalore and he sits to the immediate left of the one from Chennai. They cannot sit anywhere so this case gets rejected

The final arrangement is shown below:

A. Vodafone

Let nine persons be sitting around a circular table from 1 to 9 in clockwise direction. R sits third to the right of W. Only two people sit between X and T and one of them sits with W. W sits at 1 and R sits at 4. There can be two cases:

Case 1: X, T sit at (9,6) in any order. The person from Delhi is third to the left of the one from Hyderabad and none of them is R or sits with R. So, the persons from Delhi, Hyderabad can sit at (6,9) (first case) or (7,1) (second case) or (8,2) (third case) respectively. S who is not from Hyderabad, sits to the immediate right of P who is not from Delhi or Hyderabad. S, P can sit at (8,7) (in first case and third case) or (3,2) (in first and second case) respectively according to the positions of the persons from Delhi, Hyderabad in respective order. The only person representing Birla sits to the immediate left of U who is from Chandigarh. R doesn’t represent Birla. U doesn’t sit with W and V. X and V represent the same company but not Reliance. T represents his company with only one person. It means that X and T cannot represent Birla. So, in the second case, U sits at 8 and the one at 7 represents Birla. As V doesn’t sit with U so V sits at 5
and Q sits at 7. The person third to the right of Q is from Mumbai. But W is from Hyderabad. So, second case is not possible. In the first case, when S, P sit at (3,2) respectively, U sits at 8 and the person at 7 must represent Birla. The person from Ahmedabad sits closer to the left of W than right of W. The persons from Ahmedabad and Pune sit together and they represent different companies. But there is no space for these persons so S, P cannot sit at (3,2) in the first case. S, P sit at (8,7) respectively in the first case. U can only sit at 3 and the person representing Birla is at 2. Thus, the persons from Ahmedabad and Pune can only sit at (8,7) respectively. As U doesn’t sit with V so V sits at 5 and Q sits at 2. The person third to the right of Q is from Mumbai so V is from Mumbai. One of the persons representing Tata is from Bangalore and he sits to the immediate left of the one from Chennai. So, W is from Bangalore and Q is from Chennai. It is given that only if Q is from Chennai then U represents Reliance. It means that R must represent Reliance. Also, R is from Lucknow. As X and V represent the same company but not Reliance so X sits at 9 and T sits at 6. V doesn’t represent Vodafone so X and V represent Airtel. They cannot represent Tata as W represents Tata. Either S or T represents Airtel. But only the persons representing Reliance sit together. So, the persons from Delhi, Hyderabad have to be at (8,2) respectively. Thus, S, P sit at (8,7) respectively. The persons from Ahmedabad, Pune can sit at (7,6) in any order. As U doesn’t sit with V so Q sits at 2 and V sits at 5. The person third to the right of Q is from Mumbai. V is from Mumbai. The person from Ahmedabad doesn’t sit to the immediate right of the one from Mumbai. So, the persons from Ahmedabad, Pune must sit at (7,6) respectively. X and V represent the same company but not Reliance so X sits at  9 and T sits at 6. One of the persons representing Tata is from Bangalore and he sits to the immediate left of the one from Chennai. So, X is from Bangalore and W is from Chennai. V also represents Tata. Only if Q is from Chennai then U represents Reliance. So, U cannot represent Reliance. Thus, S and P have to represent Reliance. Also, R is from Lucknow. Either S or T represents Airtel so T represents Airtel. U doesn’t represent Tata. The person to the immediate right of Q doesn’t represent Vodafone. It means that U has to represent Airtel. Thus, R has to represent Vodafone. The person from Chennai doesn’t represent Airtel. It implies that W has to represent Vodafone.

Case 2: X, T sit at (2,5) in any order. The person from Delhi is third to the left of the one from Hyderabad and none of them is R or sits with R. So, the persons from Delhi, Hyderabad can sit at (6,9) (first case) or (7,1) (second case) or (8,2) (third case) respectively. S who is not from Hyderabad, sits to the immediate right of P who is not from Delhi or Hyderabad. S, P can sit at (8,7) (in first case and third case) or (9,8) (in second case) or (7,6) (in second and third case) respectively according to the positions of the persons from Delhi, Hyderabad in respective order. The only person representing Birla sits to the immediate left of U who is from Chandigarh. R doesn’t represent Birla. U doesn’t sit with W and V. X and V represent the same company but not Reliance. T represents his company with only one person. It means that X and T cannot represent Birla. So, U who is from Chandigarh cannot sit anywhere in any of the cases except in the second case when S, P sit at (7,6) respectively. Thus, U sits at 8 and S is from Birla. As U doesn’t sit with V so Q sits at 9 and V sits at 3. X and V represent the same company but not Reliance. So, V and X cannot sit together. X, T sit at (5,2) respectively. The person from Ahmedabad sits closer to the left of W than right of W. The persons from Ahmedabad and Pune sit together and they represent different companies. So, the persons from Ahmedabad and Pune sit at (6,5) respectively. The person third to the right of Q is from Mumbai. V is from Mumbai. One of the persons representing Tata is from Bangalore and he sits to the immediate left of the one from Chennai. They cannot sit anywhere so this case gets rejected

The final arrangement is shown below:

C. Geeta

From the direct information, we get the following table:

Idea – Hike
Docomo – WhatsApp
Only Priya can use WhatsApp. Thus, Geeta uses Hike and has Idea connection. It also implies that Honey uses Skype and Sarita uses Viber. As Simran doesn’t use MTNL so Mina must use MTNL and Simran uses BSNL.
The final arrangement is shown below:

B. Mina

From the direct information, we get the following table:

Idea – Hike
Docomo – WhatsApp
Only Priya can use WhatsApp. Thus, Geeta uses Hike and has Idea connection. It also implies that Honey uses Skype and Sarita uses Viber. As Simran doesn’t use MTNL so Mina must use MTNL and Simran uses BSNL.
The final arrangement is shown below:

E. All

From the direct information, we get the following table:

Idea – Hike
Docomo – WhatsApp
Only Priya can use WhatsApp. Thus, Geeta uses Hike and has Idea connection. It also implies that Honey uses Skype and Sarita uses Viber. As Simran doesn’t use MTNL so Mina must use MTNL and Simran uses BSNL.
The final arrangement is shown below:

D. BSNL

From the direct information, we get the following table:

Idea – Hike
Docomo – WhatsApp
Only Priya can use WhatsApp. Thus, Geeta uses Hike and has Idea connection. It also implies that Honey uses Skype and Sarita uses Viber. As Simran doesn’t use MTNL so Mina must use MTNL and Simran uses BSNL.
The final arrangement is shown below:

A. Twitter

From the direct information, we get the following table:

Idea – Hike
Docomo – WhatsApp
Only Priya can use WhatsApp. Thus, Geeta uses Hike and has Idea connection. It also implies that Honey uses Skype and Sarita uses Viber. As Simran doesn’t use MTNL so Mina must use MTNL and Simran uses BSNL.
The final arrangement is shown below: