Daily Editorial Updates with Vocabulary : Bilateral Silence

2

 Welcome to letsstudytogether.co, as we all know that now a day’s in All Banking Exams and other competitive exams most of the English Sections were taken from Editorial pages. So it is essential to have a sound knowledge and understanding of English vocabulary. So here we are presenting you Daily Editorial Updates with Vocabulary from various newspapers like The HIndu,The Statesman, read  thisTimes Of India etc. This will help you to sail and score good marks in English Language section.

Aspirants those who want to improve in Enread this Daily Editorial Updates with Vocabulary .we will be updating daily and make use of it.


Daily Editorial Updates with Vocabulary

Bilateral Silence

It was a cool winter morning in late December 2001 when India decided to mobilise its forces on its border with Pakistan, in retaliation  to the terror attack on the Indian Parliament on December 13 that year. The reaction, which was meant to pressure the seemingly recalcitrant neighbor, was the biggest troops deployment since the war in 1971. However, no lines were crossed due to foreign intervention and a realisation around the world that a conflict between the two South Asian neighbours who had gone overtly  nuclear in 1998 might result in something very ugly. It was in the backdrop of this standoff  or the earlier Kargil crisis that redlines were drawn informally.

Sixteen years later, the region stands on the brink of an impending conflict with little clarity regarding the threshold and even less lucidity regarding which international player will intervene. Unlike in the past, the US may not be in a position to give its advice due to its own internal chaos, lesser interest in South Asia and an inability to develop a relationship with anyone in Islamabad. Although deterrence and an understanding of each other’s thresholds worked for almost a decade after 2002, both sides worked towards finding means to challenge the status-quo. So, India’s “cold start” doctrine was meant for Delhi to circumvent the four redlines highlighted by the head of Pakistan’s Strategic Plans Division (SPD), Lieutenant General Khalid Kidwai. Pakistan reacted to India’s plan by developing a range of battlefield tactical nuclear weapons.

Since 2013-2014, all lines have become muddled and the military-strategic visibility has become poorer as both sides enjoy a certain level of confidence that any initiative will be to their advantage, not to the adversary’s. While Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his party’s political gains are unquestionable, the military in Pakistan has managed to cobble  together a popular opinion regarding its role as the defender of the territorial and ideological integrity of the state. Voices that question the narrative no longer hold centrestage in public discourse — not to forget the tremendous confidence gained by Islamabad through finding space in the evolving regional political map as China’s partner.

This description of similar levels of confidence enjoyed by the two states tends to point towards an increased threat of war and conflict. Historically, every time both India and Pakistan attained higher degrees of self-confidence, the results were not good. These are indeed interesting times when military thresholds are being re-checked in a nuclear environment. Given the absence of direct conversation, there is also little clarity as to how far the two sides will go. The Pakistan Army has stated that it is not involved in mutilating. bodies of Indian soldiers. But even if it is random militants, or someone else to blame, the question is finding a possibility to talk before things go too far out of hand.

Another interesting development in the past decade or more pertains to war and conflict becoming matters in which popular opinion weigh in. While this may be a deliberate formula of the states, the issue is that the media hype around war and peace has acquired a life of its own. But this means that any escalation will result in greater public support to their respective armed forces.

The recipe is dangerous especially if India tries to go beyond its claims of a surgical strike in September 2016. The fact that Pakistan did not react or admit to such strikes having happened kept things from boiling over. However, if India intended to make its response more visible, it could result in serious repercussions for the entire region. Strategic analysts have often talked about the rationality of Pakistan’s armed forces that, it is believed, may force it to not up the ante and cap it at a lower level. The question is, what if it does not follow this script?

It is beyond doubt that this is one time when the two states need to engage in a dialogue through reliable interlocutors. .Understandably, Pakistan must solve its internal confusion of civil-military being on separate pages as far as a policy on India is concerned. In fact, the business tycoon Sajjan Jindal’s visit to see Nawaz Sharif did not benefit the prime minister. If anything, the narrative popularised through the media presented him as suspicious and unreliable. From a common sense perspective, this is not the best of conditions a country ought to find itself in, especially when confronted with a grave  situation.

However, the military believes it can protect the territory and the core strategic understanding is that there can be no peace with the bigger neighbour unless outstanding disputes are resolved. It would certainly not allow a political leadership to conspire a solution without taking key stakeholders on board. The civil-military squabble  tends to hide the difference of opinion that exists within the military regarding how far negotiations between Islamabad and New Delhi should go. While some may support the idea of negotiations, there are those who would like to go the whole hog in de-Indianising their society and culture.

Unfortunately, for South Asia, peace and camaraderie  amongst the people is the biggest collateral damage of the present environment. The talk of action-reaction and hostility is increasingly de-sensitising people towards the idea of peaceful co-existence or building upon a shared culture of the soil. Any further increase in hostility is likely to make common people even wearier  of each other. While it is understandable to see the militaries brace themselves for greater conflict, the leadership ought to find ways to talk. It is important to realise that talking is imperative.

Magical Vocabulary from ” The Indian Express”

  1. Recalcitrant(adjective) (उद्दण्ड) :Having an obstinately uncooperative attitude towards authority or discipline.

Synonyms: Obstinate, Recusant, In Submissive, Wayward.

Antonyms: Subservient, Obedient.

Example: After the economy soured, the president fired his recalcitrant advisers.

  1. Overtly(adverb) (प्रत्यक्षरूप से) : Without concealment or secrecy

Synonyms:  Openly, Visibly, Seemingly.

Antonyms: Secretly, Covertly, Furtively.

Example: Since the detective is an observant fellow, he can easily notice facts that are not overt.

  1. Standoff(noun) (गतिरोध/रुकावट):A deadlock between two equally matched opponents in a dispute or conflict.

Synonyms: Deadlock, Stalemate, Impasse, Standstill, Dead End.

Antonyms: Breakthrough, Solution.

Example: After two hours of game they had played to a 5–5 standoff.

 

  1. Muddle(verb) (अव्यवस्थितकरना/अस्तव्यस्त कर देना) : Bring into a disordered or confusing state.

Synonyms: Confuse, Mix Up, Jumble, Jumble Up, Disarrange, Disorganize, Disorder.

Antonyms: Arrange, Align, Order.

Example: Because Jane has no computer skills, she has managed to muddle our accounting records.

  1. Mutilate(verb) (अंगभंग करना/विकृत करना) : Inflict serious damage on.

Synonyms: Cripple, Disable, Incapacitate, Lame, Maim.

Antonyms: Cure, Heal, Rehabilitate, Remedy.

Example: Invaders went to great lengths to mutilate the beautiful paintings on the temple walls, permanently destroying the displays.

  1. Grave(adjective) (गंभीर) :Giving cause for alarm; serious.

Synonyms: Serious, Alarming, Solemn, Weighty, Critical.

Antonyms: Trivial, Frivolous, Unimportant.

Example: This violation of company rules is a grave matter.

  1. Squabble(noun) (झगड़ा/तकरार) : A noisy quarrel about something trivial. 

Synonyms: Quarrel, Row, Argument, Fight, Contretemps, Altercation.

Antonyms: Accord, Agreement, Harmony.

Example: She decided to break up with her boyfriend after he felt the need to squabble every time she smiled at another man.

  1. Camaraderie(noun) (सौहार्द/भाई-चारा):Mutual trust and friendship among people who spend a lot of time together.

Synonyms: Friendship, Comradeship, Fellowship, Companionship, Brotherhood.

Antonyms: Gloom, Dislike, Hate.

Example: The cricket players had a sense of camaraderie which made them an unbeatable team.

  1. Weary(adjective) (थकाऊ/थकानेवाला):Exhausted in strength, endurance, vigor, or freshness.

Synonyms: Bored, Exhausted, Tiring, Prostrate.

Antonyms: Energetic, Fresh, Invigorated.

Example: After the long road trip, we were all so weary we fell asleep in our clothes.

  1. Cobble(verb) (मरम्मतकरना/बनाना) :  Roughly assemble or produce something from available parts or elements. Figurative – To make or repair 

Synonyms: Assemble, Construct, Create, Fabricate, Synthesize, Accomplish.

Antonyms: Demolish, Destroy, Divide, Ruin.

Example: The book was perfectly cobbled together from two separate stories.

 

Courtesy And Copyright :-   The Indian Express

For Daily Editorial Updates with Vocabulary Click Here.

For Daily Editorial pages from All News papers in PDF Click Here

THE HINDU Editorial with Vocabulary Weekly Pdf

             The Hindu Editorial with Vocabulary – April – 2nd Week Pdf

The Hindu Editorial with Vocabulary – April – 3rd Week Pdf

           



             

For more details click here 

Thank you, all the best. and lets study together.

Learn Better, Do better, Be better